- Jul 25, 2015
- Reaction score
I have followed Lunardi's selections closely over the years and think he does an excellent job usually only missing a couple of teams at most. He is not picking who he thinks should be in but what the committee has done in the past. Not sure who is doing this ranking you mention. BTW Bracketville has us out.Lunardi get's his 'pub' from being associated with ESPN and Jerry Palm from his relationship with CBS. A lot refer to their brackets for answers and I've yet to see a good explanation as to why.
Lundardi, as example, has been in the bottom half of correct brackets called for the last five years running. In more accurate terms, he's ranked 68th out of 111 for bacteriology accuracy. He has Bama out. Maybe he's right.
On the other hand there are two other brackets, Dephi and Bracketville, who are #1 and #2 in accuracy over the same five year period. Both have Bama in the dance.
On a different note:
Is it somewhat ironic that we see so many people criticize Denich on her reports from the football committee and yet we don't see that being levied against the likes of Lundardi and Palm. Have they done anything to establish a credibility factor higher than that of Denich? It seems to me they're in the same boat.
Add projected 8-seed Iowa to this list. 12 projected NCAA tournament opponents, 3 wins.